Iheanacho V Uzochukwu : Africanfootball - Uzochukwu (1997) 1 scnj 117 at 128.
Iheanacho V Uzochukwu : Africanfootball - Uzochukwu (1997) 1 scnj 117 at 128.. May their souls rest in perfect peace. Uzochukwu 1997 2 nwlr pt 487 at 257 and salako v. 1385) 188 at 220, where the court of appeal per iyizoba, j.c.a. Oasis finance ltd (2013) 18 n.w.l.r. Sc.71/1996 3plr/1997/31 (sc) iledare v.
1385) 188 at 220, where the court of appeal per iyizoba, j.c.a. Uzochukwu (977) 1 scnj, however, a landlord can come for inspection of the property in order to inspect and carry out repairs. Sc.71/1996 3plr/1997/31 (sc) iledare v. Igp 1991 5 nwlr pt 193 at 593. I have carefully considered the submissions of counsel, in the case of iheanacho v.
Oasis finance ltd (2013) 18 n.w.l.r. The mesne profit is the accumulated rent during the trial period. It is important to note that the original taking may be lawful but once the detention becomes wrongful, the action will lie. She referred to iheanacho v. Mbadiwe (supra) and onoguruwa v. 1385) 188 at 220, where the court of appeal per iyizoba, j.c.a. Uzochukwu (1997) 2 nwlr (pt. The apex court held further that, nothing stopped a body corporate such as the respondent, from getting the.
It is obvious that if at the time the.
Read supreme court judgement iheanacho v uzochukwu (1997) 2 n.w.l.r (pt. Uzochukwu (supra), it is only when the tenancy has not expired that there will be need to determine same by notice to quit. I have carefully considered the submissions of counsel, in the case of iheanacho v. 1385) 188 at 220, where the court of appeal per iyizoba, j.c.a. Oasis finance ltd (2013) 18 n.w.l.r. Uzochukwu (977) 1 scnj, however, a landlord can come for inspection of the property in order to inspect and carry out repairs. 1385) 188 at 220, where the court of appeal per iyizoba, j.c.a. Mbadiwe (1986) 1 nwlr (14) 47 at 60; Uzochukwu (1997) 2 nwlr (pt. From the said provision all the respondent needed provide was service of seven days to the appellant and that was done. Williams 1998 11 nwlr pt 574 p 505 at 522. (presided) idris legbo kutigl j.s.c. I have carefully considered the submissions of counsel, in the case of iheanacho v.
Williams 1998 11 nwlr pt 574 p 505 at 522. It begins to count from the moment the tenant became a statutory tenant ;a tenant that can only be evicted by order of court. The detention becomes wrongful if the person in possession of the chattel or goods has no reasonable justification for retaining the goods or chattel. Nwaugo esq, a former national legal adviser to the nba, the fake lawyer was prosecuted in charge. As clearly set out in iheanacho v.
203/1990 3plr/1997/45 (sc) other citations. Adebogun (2008) 10 nwlr (pt. 1385) 188 at 220, where the court of appeal per iyizoba, j.c.a. 1385) 188 at 220;_ relying on the supreme court in iheanacho v. To my lovely wife, tina, who never lost hope and patience, but unselfishly sacrificed her time and pleasure In iheanacho v uzochukwu, 10 the supreme court set out the procedure for recovery of premises as follows: 203/1990 3plr/1997/30 (sc) ikenna v. Sc.310/1990 3plr/1997/32 (sc) in the matter of the arbitration of obin & twomey services limited v.
Courts with jurisdiction on recovery matters generally, magistrate courts (district courts in the north) and high courts have jurisdiction to entertain recovery of premises cases.
Uzochukwu in the supreme court of nigeria friday, 31st january, 1997. Williams 1998 11 nwlr pt 574 p 505 at 522. From the said provision all the respondent needed provide was service of seven days to the appellant and that was done. From the said provision all the respondent needed provide was service of seven days to the appellant and that was done. The mesne profit is the accumulated rent during the trial period. Oasis finance ltd (2013) 18 n.w.l.r. Mbadiwe (1986) 1 nwlr (14) 47 at 60; 1385) 188 at 220, where the court of appeal per iyizoba, j.c.a. Oasis finance ltd (2013) 18 n.w.l.r. I have carefully considered the submissions of counsel, in the case of iheanacho v. I have carefully considered the submissions of counsel, in the case of iheanacho v. In abuja (rpa) by personal service on the tenant, but if he is evading service or cannot be found, there can be substituted service by posting on some conspicuous part of the premises. She referred to iheanacho v.
Uzochukwu (1997) 2 nwlr (pt. Oasis finance ltd (2013) 18 n.w.l.r. 1385) 188 at 220, where the court of appeal per iyizoba, j.c.a. Chief john iheanacho ogidi, who died during my childhood to my mother, lolo anna iheanacho, and my only sister, mrs. The detention becomes wrongful if the person in possession of the chattel or goods has no reasonable justification for retaining the goods or chattel.
Adebogun (2008) 10 nwlr (pt. According to elder victor c. Oasis finance ltd (2013) 18 n.w.l.r. The landlord desiring to recover possession of premise let to his tenant shall firstly, unless the tenancy has already expired, determine the tenancy by service on the defendant of an Uzochukwu (1997) 2 nwlr (pt. Oasis finance ltd (2013) 18 n.w.l.r. From the said provision all the respondent needed provide was service of seven days to the appellant and that was done. It is obvious that if at the time the landlord seeks to recover his premises, the tenancy had already expired, it is reasonable to assume that there will be no need for a quit notice.
Oasis finance ltd (2013) 18 n.w.l.r.
The court cited the case of iheanacho v uzochukwu (1997) 2 nwlr (pt. 203/1990 3plr/1997/30 (sc) ikenna v. A landlord desiring to recover possession of premises let to his tenant shall: As clearly set out in iheanacho v. I have carefully considered the submissions of counsel, in the case of iheanacho v. Uzochukwu (1997) 1 scnj 117 at 128. It is obvious that if at the time the. Oasis finance ltd (2013) 18 n.w.l.r. It is obvious that if at the time the landlord seeks to recover his premises, the tenancy had already expired, it is reasonable to assume that there will be no need for a quit notice. Courts with jurisdiction on recovery matters generally, magistrate courts (district courts in the north) and high courts have jurisdiction to entertain recovery of premises cases. The apex court held further that, nothing stopped a body corporate such as the respondent, from getting the. Williams 1998 11 nwlr pt 574 p 505 at 522. 203/1990 3plr/1997/45 (sc) other citations.
Komentar
Posting Komentar